After the NEET paper leak 2026, Prime Minister Narendra Modi formed a task force headed by Infosys co-founder Nandan Nilekani to reform the exam. This task force has started its work. In this series, Nandan Nilekani, while presenting a solution to paper leaks, suggests creating a question bank and finally preparing papers from this bank with the help of AI. This suggestion is still being debated. Meanwhile, Super 30’s Anand Kumar disagreed with this suggestion. For this he has given three reasons.

Come on, let’s find out what arguments Anand Kumar of Super 30 gave to disagree with the suggestion of Nandan Nilekani, who prepared the paper with the help of AI.

Anand Kumar gave three reasons for dissent

Super 30’s Anand Kumar has disagreed with Nandan Nilekani’s suggestion to prepare the paper with the help of AI at the last minute to prevent paper leaks. For this he has given three reasons. Anandan Kumar wrote a post on the social media platform Anandan Kumar said that there are three important reasons behind my dissent. Let us know what three reasons he has given.

Remote villages still have no access to computers

Anand Kumar of Super 30, giving the first reason for dissent, said that preventing paper leakage is very important, but it is not appropriate to make the entire examination system computerized for this purpose. He said that even today there are lakhs of talented children in remote villages and poor families of our country who do not have enough computer facilities. It may be that in an effort to prevent cheating, we create a new barrier for those children.

Will the facilities of all centers be similar to metro cities?

Giving another reason, he raised a question and wrote that if a center will be set up to conduct any examination in a remote area. So will the facilities and security available there be similar to that of a metro city centre?

Who can guarantee that the question will be correct?

Giving the third main reason for objection, Anand Kumar has said that it is very common that mistakes are made in the questions prepared for various examinations almost every year, even though the number of questions is very small. Now when a question bank of thousands of questions will be created, from which the AI ​​will select the questions at the last minute, then what is the guarantee that all the questions will be correct.

How appropriate is taking AI help in NEET? Sri Nandan Nilekaniji is very respectful to me. It is my good fortune that he appreciated me and my effort Super 30 in his famous book Imagining India: The Idea of ​​a Renewed Nation. I have always had deep respect for him. But I politely disagree with his recent suggestion of taking AI help at the last moment to prevent paper leaks in exams like NEET. There are three important reasons behind my disagreement. First of all it is very important to prevent paper leakage, but for this, how appropriate would it be to make the entire examination system computerized? Even today there are lakhs of talented children in remote villages and poor families of our country who do not have enough access to computers. Lest we create a new barrier for those children in an effort to prevent cheating. Secondly, even if there is a test center in a remote area, will the facilities and security available there be similar to centers in metro cities? Thirdly, it is very common that mistakes are made in the questions prepared for various exams almost every year despite the very small number of questions. Now when a question bank of thousands of questions will be created from which the AI ​​will pick the questions at the last minute, then what is the guarantee that all the questions will be correct? I am not against technology or AI. Instead, I believe that AI can revolutionize the field of education. It can also help experts in preparing question papers. But there is a big difference between helping and making the final decision. Based on my experience of working with students over the past several decades and understanding the possibilities of AI, I would like to say this – to prevent paper leaks, we must address the weaknesses in the system, and not create a new system that makes opportunities for poor and talented children more difficult. Because the real purpose of the exam is not to show the power of technology, but to identify the talent hidden in every nook and cranny of the country. And we should never forget that one mistake can cost not just a few points but a child’s entire dream. #NEET #Artificial Intelligence #EducationReform #Super30 #AnandKumar #Superinfinity

— Anand Kumar (@teacheranand) October 14, 2026

The lack of system to prevent paper leakage has to be overcome.

Anand Kumar of Super30 wrote in his post that he is not against technology or AI. It is agreed that AI can bring revolutionary changes in the field of education. He can also help the experts in preparing the question paper, but there is a big difference between helping and making the final decision.

Anand Kumar has said that he has been working with students for the past several decades and understands the possibilities of AI. Based on this experience, he has said that weaknesses in the system have to be removed to stop paper leaks. There is no need for a new system that makes opportunities harder for poor and gifted children.

Anand Kumar says that the real purpose of the exam is not to show the power of technology, but to identify the talent hidden in every corner of the country and we should never forget that the loss of one mistake is not just a few marks but can destroy a child’s entire dream.